NEWS

4.1 LABOUR LAW - II (S.V.UNIVERSITY OLD QUESTION PAPERS)

LABOUR LAW - II SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU june 2014 page-1

LABOUR LAW - II SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU june 2014 page-2
LABOUR LAW - II SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU june 2013 page-1



LABOUR LAW - II SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU june 2013 page-2

3.4 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (SV UNIVERSITY OLD QUESTION PAPERS)

PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU jul 2002 page-1
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU jul 2002 page-2
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU dec 2002 page-1
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU dec 2002 page-2&3


3.3 COMPANY LAW (SV UNIVERSITY OLD QUESTIONPAPERS)

COMPANY LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU jul 2002 page-1
COMPANY LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU jul 2002 page-2
COMPANY LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU dec 2002 page-1
COMPANY LAW SEM-III 3YR.LLB SVU dec 2002 page-2&3

3.1 semester3 PROPERTY LAW (SV UNIVERSITY OLD QUESTION PAPERS)


PROPERTY LAW SEM-III 3YEAR LLB SVU FEB 2013 page-1
PROPERTY LAW SEM-III 3YEAR LLB SVU FEB 2013 page-2
PROPERTY LAW SEM-III 3YEAR LLB SVU FEB 2012 page-1
PROPERTY LAW SEM-III 3YEAR LLB SVU FEB 2012 page-2

JURISPRUDENCE (Landmark Cases in Supreme Court of india)


A.K. Gopalan v. The State of Madras. Union Of India: Intervener, 1950 SCR 88.
The plaintiff was detained under the “Preventive Detention Act (Act IV of 1950). The plaintiff applied under article 32 of the constitution for a writ of hapeas corpus for release from detention, on the grounds that the act was unconstitutional, and went against article 13, 19, 21, 22. He claimed that his detention was illegal.
The court held that the act, with the exception of section 14, was not in “contravene” of the articles of constitution, and since the invalidity of section 14 did not affect the validity of the whole act, the detention was not illegal.
“Section 14 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, contravenes the provisions of Art. 9.9. (5) of the Constitution in so far as it prohibits a person detained from disclosing to the Court the grounds on which a detention order has been made or the representation made by him against the order of detention, and is to that extent ultra vires and void.”
The State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose and others., 1954 SCR 587.
Pandit M.S.M. Sharma v.

2.4 semester2 Jurisprudence (s.v.university old question papers)

2nd semester Jurisprudence (s.v.university)
Jurisprudence 3 year LLB June 2012 page-1 
Jurisprudence 3 year LLB June 2012 page-2
Jurisprudence 3 year LLB June 2011 page-1 Jurisprudence 3 year LLB June 2011 page-2
 

2.3 semester2 Environmental Law (s.v.university old question papers)

2nd semester Environmental Law (s.v.university)
Environmental Law 3 year LLB June 2012 page-1 
Environmental Law 3 year LLB June 2012 page-2
Environmental Law 3 year LLB June 2011 page-1  Environmental Law 3 year LLB June 2011 page-2  

2.2 constitutional law-II (s.v.university old question papers)

2nd semester Constitutional law-II (s.v.university)
Sep 2014 page-1
Sep 2014 page-2

June 2013 page-1

June 2013 page-2

2.1 semester2 contracts-II (s.v.university old question papers)

2nd semester Contracts-II (s.v.university)
Contracts-II 3 year LLB June 2013 page-1


 
Contracts-II 3 year LLB June 2013 page-2


Contracts-II 3 year LLB June 2012 page-1 
Contracts-II 3 year LLB June 2012 page-2